Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2017 Year 2017 This

Validity of assessment u/s 144 without issuing notice - best ...


High Court Rules Assessment u/s 144 Invalid Due to Lack of Notice in Income Tax Case.

February 2, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Validity of assessment u/s 144 without issuing notice - best judgment assessment - the assessment was patently illegal - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the assessment order u/s 144/147 and the demand notice u/s 156, treating them as non-existent due to the failure to mention the...

  3. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  4. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  5. Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

  6. Validity of notice proposing for Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - Failure to file ITR in response to notice u/s 148 r.w.s. 142(1) due to medical reasons and recovery...

  7. The ITAT Chennai considered a case involving a Best Judgment Assessment conducted u/s. 144 due to the assessee's failure to file a return within the specified time u/s....

  8. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  9. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

  10. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  11. Validity of Assessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 143(3) - additions based on seized material. - As on 19.11.2012 the assessment for assessment year 2010-11 was not pending. AO has...

  12. Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - Estimation of income - The Assessing Officer issued notices under section 143(2) as well as various notices issued under sections...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

  14. The ITAT Ahmedabad held that a best judgment assessment u/s 144 without issuing notice u/s 143(2) is invalid if the assessee has filed a return and responded to AO's...

  15. Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates