Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of ...

Tribunal's Rejection of Duty Refund Claim Criticized for Legal Errors and Misinterpretation of Limitation Issues.

February 17, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of unjust enrichment - We are unhappy at the manner in which the Tribunal has dealt with the Appeals - the Tribunal committed serious errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal did not elaborate as to how, in this case, the question of limitation can be said to be a pure legal issue. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - excess duty paid - rejection on the ground of ...

Tribunal's Rejection of Duty Refund Claim Criticized for Legal Errors and Misinterpretation of Limitation Issues.

February 17, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal committed a manifest error in non-suiting the appellant's claim on the sole ground that the appellant was...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

The CESTAT Chandigarh, in a majority decision, in an appellate tribunal decision, allowed the appeal regarding the rejection of a refund claim for duty paid on outward...

Adjudication of show cause notice (SCN) after several year - The tribunal noted the history of duty exemption, litigation, and subsequent duty imposition on resin...

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee to claim refund of Rs. 3,28,75,733/- towards Central Value Added Tax credit,...

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Quick Updates: