Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non disclosure of income earned by way ...


Penalty Upheld for Non-Disclosure of Director Sitting Fees; Section 271(1)(c) Applies Despite Lack of Books.

March 4, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non disclosure of income earned by way of Director Sitting Fee - merely because the assessee is not maintaining books of accounts, he cannot get rid of offering the income earned by him during the year - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  3. Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

  4. The key points from the legal text are: Section 153A assessment - Limitation period applies based on when seized materials were handed over to the Assessing Officer...

  5. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  6. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  7. Remuneration paid to whole-time directors employed by the company is not liable to service tax, as it is considered salary. However, sitting fees paid to non-employed...

  8. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that non-deduction of TDS on directors' fees and transaction charges u/s 194J was not liable for penalty u/s 271C. It accepted...

  9. HC upheld penalty under s271(1)(c) for concealment of income where appellant transferred stock-in-trade at inflated market value and withdrew profits without full...

  10. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  11. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

  12. Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

  13. Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates