Imposition of penalty u/r 25 - CENVAT credit - Even though the ...

Penalty Imposed u/r 25 for CENVAT Credit Violation Despite No Goods Confiscation Per Central Excise Rules 2002.

March 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 - CENVAT credit - Even though the goods are not confiscated there is clear contravention of the provisions of the Rules/Notifications as provided under Sub-Clause (d) of Rule 25 of CER, 2002. Therefore, the penalty imposed is just and proper - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 - CENVAT credit - Even though the ...

Penalty Imposed u/r 25 for CENVAT Credit Violation Despite No Goods Confiscation Per Central Excise Rules 2002.

March 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Second stage Dealer - Violation in respect of issuing Invoice - proper invoices were not issued and consequently, there is...

Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k)...

The CESTAT upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs used for laying foundations or making support structures for capital goods, as per the revised definition of...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Penalty - CENVAT credit on G.T.A. - CENVAT Credit received and utilized both for traded as well as manufactured goods were duly accounted for in the CENVAT Credit...

Levy of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Penalty on Registered Dealers, Unregistered Dealers and Transporters - Availment of fraudulent credit - issuance of Cenvatable invoices...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

The appellant was denied CENVAT credit on the allegation that the sender units inflated the value of Soap Noodles stock transferred to the appellant, leading to excess...

Recovery of Cenvat credit - goods seized and confiscated are imported goods thus the provision of the Rules 25/26 of CER not applicable to the sized imported consignment...

CENVAT credit - appellant is entitled to avail cenvat credit on these cables either as capital goods or input as per cenvat credit rules 2004 - AT

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Quick Updates: