Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Revision u/s 263 - Disallowance u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D(2)(ii) - ...


Disagreement with AO's view u/s 263 and Rule 8D(2)(ii) doesn't make assessment erroneous or prejudicial.

April 19, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - Disallowance u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D(2)(ii) - the mere fact that the CIT is not in agreement with the view adopted by the AO, would not render the order of assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

  2. The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

  3. Revision u/s 263 - applicability of provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - purchase of shops on less than stamp valuation - record clearly reveal that the AO has...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous...

  5. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  6. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  7. Assessee received funds from four parties, which were not considered by the Assessing Officer (AO) during assessment proceedings u/s 147 read with Section 144. The...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - revision based on the audit objection - borrowed satisfaction - The ITAT noted that the AO had called for details and evidence from the appellant and...

  9. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  10. The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

  11. The ITAT held that the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act for disallowance u/s 40A(3) and addition on account of...

  12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

  13. The AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interests. The filing fee for increasing share capital was rightly allowed as revenue expenditure,...

  14. The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - during the course of assessment, the AO made an addition on account of unexplained cash credit of unsecured loan u/s 68 - AO omitted to disallow the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates