Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Revision u/s 263 - deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - AO failed to apply ...


CIT Corrects AO's Deduction Error: Section 263 Invoked to Address Revenue Loss Due to Misapplication of Section 115JB.

April 27, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - AO failed to apply the provisions of section 115JB - CIT was able to demonstrate that the view taken by the AO was not plausible rather it was legally unsustainable and incorrect. Besides it resulted in loss of revenue. Thus both the prerequisites were there when the CIT issued the notice u/s. 263 - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

  2. Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

  3. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) due to notices not being served on the assessee during the appellate proceedings because of address...

  5. Disallowance of Capital Loss on Sale of Shares - sale of shares due to the amalgamation of certain entities - The AO disallowed the loss, treating it as an artificial...

  6. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  8. The legal judgment addressed various issues. Firstly, regarding addition u/s 68 for unsecured loans, the AO questioned the creditworthiness of the loans. The CIT(A)...

  9. Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

  10. CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

  11. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  12. Loss due to robbery of gold ornaments is allowable as a deduction if it arises from carrying on business and is incidental to it. The CIT(A) erred in restricting the...

  13. Deduction of broken period interest paid on securities and deduction of expenditure incurred on the issue of Fully Convertible Debentures (FCDs). Regarding broken period...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  15. Revision u/s 263 by CIT-A - AO’s order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue since mark to market loss incurred by Company on revaluation of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates