Liability of interest - Since differential duty was voluntarily ...

Interest Not Applicable on Voluntary Pre-Assessment Duty Payment Under Central Excise Rules 2002.

June 3, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Liability of interest - Since differential duty was voluntarily paid before finalization of assessments which did not result in any dues and payable to the Govt, the interest was not leviable. If the interest was payable on the duty on which the assessee paid differential duty prior to finalization of assessment, then the Central Excise rules 2002 would have specifically said so - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Liability of interest - Since differential duty was voluntarily ...

Interest Not Applicable on Voluntary Pre-Assessment Duty Payment Under Central Excise Rules 2002.

June 3, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Provisions contained in Rule 8 does not absolve the assessee from substantial conditions of payment of duty of claim of rebate of duty under Rule 18 of Central Excise...

Rebate of duty on exports - Compound duty on Pan Masala Packing - Rule 14 - the stand of the department that no rebate can be allowed under Rule 14 of the Central Excise...

Delayed payment of duty - Rule 8(3) of central excise rules, 2002 - Appellant is liable for payment of interest on the delayed payment for the disputed period as...

The CESTAT held that interest on differential duty is a statutory liability arising from the date of removal of goods, irrespective of when the differential duty is paid....

Rebate of Central Excise duty - Non-payment of duty due to restriction in utilization of credit under Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - the rebate claims cannot...

Penatly - default in payment of duty - provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - penalty under Rule 27 only can be imposed - no penalty under Rule 25...

Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - In case of breakage/destruction of final product, remission can be claimed under Rule 21 of Central...

Claim of duty drawback - the applicant by way of procuring duty free inputs under Rule 19(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 has contravened the clause (ii) of the second...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Through Rule 12 CCC of the 2002 Rules, the Central Government enabled the concerned assessing authority to place restriction as to the facility of making deferred...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Quick Updates: