Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician's ...

Refund Claim Remanded Due to Incorrect Methodology; Tribunal Misapplied 2003 Circular Instead of 2002 Guidelines for Valuation.

July 12, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician's sample - The assessable value, as indicated in the 2002 circular, is 115% of the cost of production. The Tribunal having come to this conclusion, in our opinion ought not to have taken recourse to the 2003 circular which adverts to the CAS-4 methodology - matter remanded back to ascertain cost of production - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim of excess duty paid - valuation of Physician's ...

Refund Claim Remanded Due to Incorrect Methodology; Tribunal Misapplied 2003 Circular Instead of 2002 Guidelines for Valuation.

July 12, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority to process the refund claims after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant....

Refund claim - Services needs to be reclassified by Revenue should be by issuing a show cause notice as reclassification in a refund claim is an incorrect appreciation...

Refund of CENVAT credit - The Tribunal observed that the refund claims were filed within the specified time frame after the introduction of the GST regime. It noted the...

Refund - The refund claims were declined only on one ground, without challenging the determination of annual capacity of production, the processor could not have...

The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that...

Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any...

The case pertains to the refund claims of service tax paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) due to a misconception or mistake of law. The tribunal held that...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund claimed of the amount paid twice, due to non-receipt of challans - whether refund claim justified? - Refund allowed - AT

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

Rejection of refund claim - GTA Service - time limitation - The tribunal reaffirmed the previous tribunal orders that transportation of coal within and outside mining...

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

Quick Updates: