Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 19, 2017

Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the petitioner could not have been permitted to revise the return so as to cure the defects that were noticed by the assessing authority. The petitioner, therefore, had to suffer the consequences of any omission in the only valid return that was filed before the assessing authority. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 19, 2017

You may also like:

Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Assessment order passed without issuing notice u/s 143(2) after considering assessee's return is illegal and liable to be set aside, as non-issuance of Section 143(2)...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - Assumption of jurisdiction to make an assessment - No return of income filed by assessee - Whether a curable defect...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

The Appellate Tribunal Rules 2016 empower the Registrar to decline registration of an appeal when defects are not cured, and to grant time for curing defects. If defects...

Addition of amount shown in revised return under the pressure of the department - revised return should relate back to the return originally filed, minus the omissions...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - reopening of assessment u/s 147 after filing of revised return - Revised return was not filed in response to notice issued u/s.148 and therefore,...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) and 271AAB - Defective notice - The argument of the department that the provisions of section 292B of the Act will cure the defect, if any, in the...

Validity on assessment order u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) in the absence of notice u/s 143(2) - defective assessment order - whether curable defect u/s 292BB? - For Section...

Quick Updates: