The products are custom made as per the needs of each of the ...

Appellants Seek to Classify Custom Products as "Lifting Machinery" Without Evidence of Single Machine Status.

September 18, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

The products are custom made as per the needs of each of the buyer. The appellants are manufacturing a few item and they wish to call those items collectively as 'Lifting machinery'. They have, however, not come forward with any evidence that the said items manufactured by them together constitute a machine.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The products are custom made as per the needs of each of the ...

Appellants Seek to Classify Custom Products as "Lifting Machinery" Without Evidence of Single Machine Status.

September 18, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Classification of a product - long pepper/pippali - appellant classified their product under CTH 12119099 whereas the department proposed its classification under...

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Classification of imported goods - dairy machinery including the packing machine - the machinery in question is an integrated plant and is to be classified as Dairy...

Cenvat credit on GP sheets cannot be denied to the appellants without corroborative evidence - AT

The case pertains to the classification of 'BAYLAN' branded water meters for customs duty purposes. The key points are: The water meters were initially classified under...

100% EOU - Import of textile machinery without payment of duty - Failure to install the capital goods within stipulated time - since the impugned goods have been...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the imported machinery "Innopet Plasmax System 20Q" used for coating PET bottles for aerating...

Seizure of gold and a vehicle by police authorities from the appellant and others. The police handed over the seized goods to customs authorities. The appellant is the...

Appellant's penalties u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside. Reliance solely on co-accused statements without corroborative evidence found...

The core issue pertains to the appropriate customs tariff classification of 'Integrated Circuit Micro Electro Mechanical System Microphones' imported by the appellant....

Classification - parts/components of crushing machinery - The appellant's claim based on their buyer's advice is not supported by any material evidence - to be...

Demand duty - Allegation of import Portland Pozzolana Cement without payment of customs duty - No evidence for actual import of the goods - The CESTAT held that the...

Suspension of Customs Broker License - Deemed Suspension or automatic suspension? - There is no existence of any provision of “Deemed Suspension” or “automatic...

AAAR dismissed appellant's appeal. Product 'Aorom Herbal Smokes' classifiable under HSN 24029010 (tobacco substitutes), not HSN 3004 (medicinal products). Appellant...

Rejection of application seeking amendment of the bill of entries u/s 149 - mis-declaration of the HSN Code due to clerical error - The appellant argued that the...

Quick Updates: