Validity of SCN - The appellants are trying to defeat the ...

Appellants obstruct proceedings by seeking cross-examination of former employees; fail to dispute goods valuation with Revenue cooperation.

February 16, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Validity of SCN - The appellants are trying to defeat the proceedings by seeking cross examination of the people who were their employees and have now left. - They cannot escape by challenging the valuation of goods where they failed to co-operate and where reasonable opportunity has been given done by the Revenue, to give proper valuation. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of SCN - The appellants are trying to defeat the ...

Appellants obstruct proceedings by seeking cross-examination of former employees; fail to dispute goods valuation with Revenue cooperation.

February 16, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

The appellant sought stay of the impugned order citing violation of principles of natural justice due to denial of cross-examination of witnesses in quasi-judicial...

Principles of Natural Justice - Levy of Penalty - It is no doubt true that there is no right of cross-examination if sufficient corroborative evidence exists, but in the...

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

HC addressed a challenge regarding natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings. Petitioners sought cross-examination rights of DRI officers following Show...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

HC held that both appellants must be given opportunity to cross-examine witness Mr. B under Section 138(B) of Customs Act, addressing discriminatory treatment by CESTAT...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

Seeking cross-examination of two persons whose statements were relied upon while issuing the SCN - Cross-examination allowed - HC

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Quick Updates: