Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of ...

Reassessment Order Validity Upheld; Denial of Cross-Examination Noted; Petitioner Advised to Appeal Within 15 Days.

May 20, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not specifically request summons for cross-examination during the assessment proceedings. While acknowledging the importance of natural justice, the Court held that the petitioner's failure to make a specific prayer for cross-examination before the assessing officer precluded the writ petition's consideration on those grounds. The Court highlighted the alternative remedy of appeal and directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within 15 days, with the option to request cross-examination of Third Party.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of ...

Reassessment Order Validity Upheld; Denial of Cross-Examination Noted; Petitioner Advised to Appeal Within 15 Days.

May 20, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

HC held that both appellants must be given opportunity to cross-examine witness Mr. B under Section 138(B) of Customs Act, addressing discriminatory treatment by CESTAT...

The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Condonation of delay of 17 days in filing of appeal - last two days being public holidays - Power of Jurisdiction of NCLAT to condone delay - Applicability of provisions...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - pre-mature appeal - The Tribunal ruled that the issue of denial of cross-examination could be...

Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount to violation of natural justice. The demand has wholly been raised, on the basis of the statements...

Clandestine removal of goods - the cross-examination of person from whose premises these documents had been recovered was necessary, more so when the same had been...

Quick Updates: