Appellant company was not manufacturing or clearing any hank ...

Company Faces Duty Demand for Concealed Cone Yarn Clearance, Fails to Disprove Allegations of Clandestine Removal.

June 18, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Appellant company was not manufacturing or clearing any hank yarn and was clearing cone yarn clandestinely. The appellant has not put forward even slightest evidence to establish that they have not indulged in clandestine removal of cone yarn. - Demand of duty with interest and penalty confirm.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant company was not manufacturing or clearing any hank ...

Company Faces Duty Demand for Concealed Cone Yarn Clearance, Fails to Disprove Allegations of Clandestine Removal.

June 18, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Default in payment of Central Excise Duty - By making the demand as above nearly one year later, for the clearances made without payment of duty revenue was not only...

CESTAT partly allowed appeal concerning duty demands on DTA sales by SEZ unit. Court held Commissioner of Customs has jurisdiction to demand duty on unauthorized DTA...

Return of goods - Rule 16 - it is observed that in yarn industry, it is not possible to undertake re-winding or remanufacturing of yarn -demand of duty confirmed - AT

Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

SSI Exemption - value of clearances - clubbing of clearances - The tribunal found the appellants engaged in the manufacture and sale of excisable goods without Central...

Captive consumption - Valuation - w.e.f. 16-3-1995, the process of winding i.e. transferring the yarn from bobbins to cones was no longer a process of manufacture -...

CESTAT allowed appeal against customs duty reclassification based on re-testing of imported fabric samples. The authorities failed to comply with Section 28 of Customs...

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - illicit clearance of imported yarn and indigenous Yarn - detection of shortages at the time of the visit of the officers - The Appellant...

100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Benefit of Exemption - When the dyed yarn is made out of twisted yarn and the twisted yarn in turn is made out of duty paid or draw twisted yarn the dyed yarn is also to...

SSI Exemption - clubbing of clearances - Two independent companies within same complex (factory premises) and common shareholders / directors / management - The...

Clearance to 100% EOU - demand of AED (Surcharge) and Education Cess - in a situation which involved clearance of goods to EOU under CT-3 Certificates the demand hit by...

The appellant company, part of a group, was involved in clandestine removal of imported partially oriented yarn (PFY) into the local market, breaching Notification No....

Quick Updates: