Refund claim - it was never the case of the Revenue that there ...

Court Dismisses Refund Claim Due to Lack of Unjust Enrichment; No Substantial Legal Question Raised.

September 25, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Refund claim - it was never the case of the Revenue that there was unjust enrichment on the part of the Assessee - the question does not give rise to any substantial question of law and is not entertained.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - it was never the case of the Revenue that there ...

Court Dismisses Refund Claim Due to Lack of Unjust Enrichment; No Substantial Legal Question Raised.

September 25, 2018

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Service tax refund claim filed beyond statutory limitation period cannot be entertained. Refund application must be filed within one year from relevant date as per...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding unjust enrichment not applicable retrospectively for finalization of provisional assessments prior to 1999....

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

Quick Updates: