Validity of assessments orders - all the three assessments are ...

Assessment Orders Invalid: Chennai Tax Officials Lacked Jurisdiction, Kolkata Authority Failed to Issue Required Notices u/s 143(2.

October 4, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of assessments orders - all the three assessments are non-est in the eyes of law since the DCIT/ACIT, Circle-11(4), Chennai issuing the section 143(2) notice(s) did not have jurisdiction and the assessing authority in Kolkata did not issue such scrutiny notices.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessments orders - all the three assessments are ...

Assessment Orders Invalid: Chennai Tax Officials Lacked Jurisdiction, Kolkata Authority Failed to Issue Required Notices u/s 143(2.

October 4, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1),...

Transfer of cases u/s 127 - assessee submitted that the AO had no jurisdiction to complete the assessment in Kolkata, since the jurisdiction over the assessee was duly...

Short/non-payment of service tax - Jurisdiction to raise the Demand - The Tribunal notes that during the period in question, the Appellant was registered in Mumbai and...

Revision u/s 263 - Assessment u/s 153C - revision of invalid assessment - the present proceedings being collateral proceedings and if the assessment order is inherently...

Transfer of Jurisdiction u/s 127 - File were transferred from Kolkata's jurisdiction to Chennai - The Revenue's argument that the PAN and files were still within...

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

The High Court held that the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) u/ss 143(3)/254/144B of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it lacked...

The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no...

Transfer of case - Validity of the assessment orders passed by the Additional CIT u/s 143(1) - Lack of inherent jurisdiction - The assessment order has been passed by...

The case pertains to the transfer of assessment proceedings u/s 127 from Coimbatore to the Central Circle in Kolkata. The respondents seized incriminating materials...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

Validity of assessment order us 153A - Approval by the JCIT as required u/s 153D - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter...

The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

Quick Updates: