Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2018 Year 2018 This

Clandestine removal - CTD Bars - from the adjudication order and ...


Appellants' Statements on CTD Bars Removal Stand Unretracted; Demand Confirmed in Adjudication Order and Show Cause Reply.

November 19, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - CTD Bars - from the adjudication order and the reply to show cause notice also it is evident that the appellants have never retracted their statements either in part or toto - demand confirmed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Duty demand - Clandestine removal of goods - TMT Bar / CTD bar - Merely on the basis of power consumption norm which has not been determined by actual experiment, duty...

  2. Suppression of production and clandestine removal - bars/ rods - MS Ingots - The order is not discussing any documents of the appellant proving the alleged clandestine...

  3. Clandestine removal of goods - assumption / presumption - demand based on the statement - charge of clandestine removal is not sustainable in the absence of any...

  4. Cenvat Credit - CTD bar invariably used for construction purpose, which cannot be allowed as inputs - AT

  5. Clandestine removal - demand has been confirmed on the basis of entries in spiral note book recovered - It is well settled law that only on the basis of statements, huge...

  6. Clandestine manufacture and removal of goods - Retraction of confession statements - appellant did not want any enquiry on the duress, etc. - during second statement,...

  7. Clandestine removal of goods - appellant was caught red handed in clearing two winch machines - appellant have recovered more duty from their buyer and have paid less to...

  8. Clandestine Removal - Retraction of statements - Statements of various persons stand recorded. No doubt the outcome of cross examination has to be given due importance...

  9. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  10. Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

  11. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  12. Clandestine removal - The department relied on statements, diaries, and records, which the appellants contested, citing coercion and lack of corroboration. The Tribunal...

  13. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  14. Clandestine Removal - reliability on statements of witnesses - It is well settled law that though the statements carry good persuasive value but such untested statements...

  15. Levy of Penalty - retracted statement - the admissibility of the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Act from the appellant on 11.03.1998, was considered by the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates