Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mere withdrawal of depreciation ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified for Withdrawing Depreciation; No Automatic Assumption of Income Concealment.

July 5, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mere withdrawal of depreciation by the assessee at the assessment stage itself does not amount to be a valid reason for treating the transaction as non-genuine and for coming to a conclusion that it had concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mere withdrawal of depreciation ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified for Withdrawing Depreciation; No Automatic Assumption of Income Concealment.

July 5, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Quick Updates: