After the re-export was declined, the goods stored in containers ...

Appellant's Factory Closed After Goods Leak Due to Denied Re-export; Penalty Imposed but Liability Remains High.

December 1, 2018

Case Laws Customs HC

After the re-export was declined, the goods stored in containers in the premises of the appellant leaked out and the appellant's factory itself is closed down - The penalty imposed in lieu of confiscation is in fact a flea bite on the appellant, who was liable to confiscation of the goods imported.

View Source

← Previous Next →

After the re-export was declined, the goods stored in containers ...

Appellant's Factory Closed After Goods Leak Due to Denied Re-export; Penalty Imposed but Liability Remains High.

December 1, 2018

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Appellant, a proprietary firm, was levied penalty for involvement in illegality by not receiving goods and receiving invoices only with intention to avail CENVAT credit...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding import of contaminated Shell on Shrimps under Notification 32/1997-Cus. Though goods were found unsuitable for export due to...

The case involves a dispute over re-exporting 4536 kgs of Organic Cashew Kernel SWP. The appellant sought permission for re-export after the goods did not meet safety...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - export of prohibited goods or not - appellant is negligent in performing their duty as a CHA - as the...

CESTAT upheld the demand for central excise duty, interest, and penalties against the appellant who contravened Notification No. 42/2001-CE and Excise Rule 19. The...

The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

Seeking permission to re-export of mobile phones - case of petitioner is that despite the payment of the redemption fine and the penalty amount, the goods have not been...

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants...

The CESTAT held that the appellant could not be implicated solely based on the retracted confessional statement of the co-accused. The telephonic call between them was...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export goods or not - goods were cleared by the appellant, not for physical exports, but were cleared by them to their sister concern, who is...

Quick Updates: