Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act ...

Customs House Agent Cleared of Abetment Charges u/s 114(i) of Customs Act; No Evidence of Suspicion Found.

May 4, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - export of prohibited goods or not - appellant is negligent in performing their duty as a CHA - as the goods were factory stuffed and sealed, the appellant-CHA has no reason to doubt any malpractice on the part of the exporter. Thus, under the facts and circumstances, no case of abetment in attempted export of prohibited goods, against the appellant is made out. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty on appellant –CHA u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act ...

Customs House Agent Cleared of Abetment Charges u/s 114(i) of Customs Act; No Evidence of Suspicion Found.

May 4, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/ss 114(i) and 114(iii) of the Customs Act without evidence of abetment in the export of red sanders. The appellant failed to obtain and verify the KYC...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Manipulation of import invoices or valuation of goods - Once a violation of CBLR Regulations is admitted, the Revenue has to...

Levy of penalty on the appellants u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Customs Broker firm - A Custom Broker is supposed to safeguard the interests of both exporters and...

Classification of services - C&F agent services - The customs clearance work was being done by them through the some other person who are appropriately registered as...

Levy of Penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - prohibited goods or not - Export of Red Sander logs under cotton tufted floor mats- colour – The case of...

Customs House Agent' Services - services charges were received by the assessee for liaisoning with the Customs department for collection of duty draw back - held as taxable - AT

This instruction clarifies that Customs Brokers should not be routinely implicated as co-noticees in cases involving interpretative disputes, unless their abetment in...

Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Imposition of penalties on CHA u/s 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 - The sole allegation against the ‘Custom House Agent’ is that they allowed unauthorized use of their...

Imposition of penalties on CHA - appellant allowed another person to file export documents on their behalf - As separate provisions exist in the Customs House Agents...

Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on...

Levy of penalties u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - overvaluation of export of goods for availment of higher rate of drawback - Penalty on person who partnered with...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - abetment in smuggling - It is settled law that for imposition of penalty, it is necessary to establish a positive role on...

Quick Updates: