Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended ...

Petitioner Misclassified as Manufacturer Instead of Trader, Faces Demand u/s 11A of Central Excise Act.

December 21, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended period of limitation - petitioner availed the benefit of the Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) scheme. - the petitioner claimed to be a manufacturer and obtained registration for the same, the adjudicating authority found the petitioner to be a trader - Issuance of SCN and order sustained.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended ...

Petitioner Misclassified as Manufacturer Instead of Trader, Faces Demand u/s 11A of Central Excise Act.

December 21, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Records maintained by a registered Central Excise Manufacturer / Dealer - Article

Levy of Central Excise duty - intermediate goods used in the manufacture of exempt final goods - the duty liability would fall on the manufacturer who is a job worker in...

The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

Service of original demand notice from the petitioner - Failure on the part of the petitioner to produce the original demand notice, along with the appeal memorandum...

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

Validity of SCN - an error in the invocation of provisions - Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been invocated in the said show cause notice and said Section...

MRP based valuation u/s 4A or transaction value u/s 4 - When no show-cause notice has been served no duty can be demanded under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act,...

Default u/s 201 - demand notices challenged by the petitioners on the ground that the tax that has been demanded as arrears of tax from the petitioners Tax Deducted at...

The Petitioner, a manufacturer of Asbestos Free brake-lining and Brake pads & brake shoes, exported these items under 28 shipping bills. However, due to a technical...

The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification and denying exemption, there should be a clear demand issued u/s 11A. Whereas, in the present case,...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Demand of duty from the Job worker who is the actual manufacturer - Extended period of limitation - Principal Manufacturer filed the declaration under Notification...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

The High Court held that the petitioner was not given adequate time to respond to a show cause notice, as only 6 clear working days were provided instead of the required...

Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of registration to the Petitioners from 01.07.2017 - The case involved a dispute regarding the activation of...

Quick Updates: