Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of ...

Petitioner's GSTIN Activated Retroactively Due to Technical Errors, Allowing Input Tax Credit Claim from July 1, 2017.

April 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of registration to the Petitioners from 01.07.2017 - The case involved a dispute regarding the activation of the petitioner's GSTIN under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. Technical glitches initially resulted in the linkage of the petitioner's GSTIN to the PAN of a partnership firm instead of the proprietor's PAN. As a consequence, the petitioner faced challenges in availing input tax credit for purchases made during the transition period. - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument, ruling that they were not responsible for the initial technical errors. The Court ordered the activation of the correct GSTIN with retroactive effect from July 1, 2017, allowing the petitioner to avail input tax credit for the relevant period.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seeking activation of GSTIN and granting final certificate of ...

Petitioner's GSTIN Activated Retroactively Due to Technical Errors, Allowing Input Tax Credit Claim from July 1, 2017.

April 19, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed the issue of cancellation of Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) of a petitioner-Firm. The respondents argued that any revenue...

Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct...

Inadvertent human error in filing a return led to denial of input tax credit (ITC) claim due to incorrect GSTIN number. The digital platform foreclosed the remedy to...

Refund claim of unutilized ITC used in making zero-rated supply of goods - Technical error / arithmetical error committed by the employee - It is settled law that the...

Petitioner satisfied all requirements to claim benefits under Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) but failed to declare intent on shipping bills due to...

Petitioner challenged order passed u/s 129(3) of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion due to typographical error in date on E-way Bill and Tax...

The High Court allowed the petitioner to rectify GSTR-1 for the months of October and November 2022 regarding five export invoices, despite the statutory time limit...

Inaction of the GST department in opening the portal qua the petitioner - transfer of registration of the dealer pursuant to the death of the proprietor of the firm -...

The High Court directed the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to amend the shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, and process the claim for the...

Rectification of errors in filing GST Returns - The case involved errors made by the petitioner in their GST returns for the period July 2017, initially by incorrectly...

Goods detained on ground of non-generation of E-Tax Invoice as per Rule 48 of GST Rules before movement; all required documents u/r 138A accompanied goods; technical...

Deemed supply - book adjustments of amount payable by one GSTIN by another GSTIN - The arrangement of settlement of dues / payment of consideration for the goods and /...

The High Court set aside the assessment order denying input tax credit to the petitioner u/s 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Acts. It directed the authorities to consider the...

While PAN is identifier at the entity level, GSTIN would be used as identifier at the transaction level for every import and export. Further, in scenarios where GSTIN is...

Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent...

Quick Updates: