Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt of cash loans exceeding ₹ ...


Director's Cash Loans Exceed Rs. 20,000, Violating Section 269SS; No Penalty u/s 271D Due to Re-deposit.

January 4, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt of cash loans exceeding ₹ 20,000/- in contravention of section 269SS from the company by the director - the said amount has also been re-deposited as evidenced by the bank statements - No penalty.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

  2. Court set aside auction sale on equitable grounds as entire amount due was deposited by respondents. Appellant deprived of using Rs.81,20,000 from 21.07.2019 till...

  3. Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

  4. Penalty for cash loan/ transactions against primary co-operatives - Section 269SS / 269T - Relief given to Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (“PACS”) and Primary...

  5. ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee's circumstances...

  6. Penalty invoking the provisions of section 271D - Managing Director of the assessee company had extended cash to the company - loan or deposits u/s 269SS - By invoking...

  7. CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

  8. The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

  9. The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of Section 271D and Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Section 271D imposes a penalty...

  10. In accordance with CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2017, the AO exceeded jurisdiction by conducting inquiry into cash deposits up to Rs. 2.5 lakhs by an individual without...

  11. Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - cash loan(s) availed form its Managing Director in current account - day-to-day emergency expenses - AO directed to examine that...

  12. The ITAT quashed penalty proceedings under section 271D imposed on the assessee for accepting cash loans of Rs. 61,50,000/- in violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal...

  13. The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

  14. HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

  15. ITAT upheld addition under section 68 regarding unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 78,00,000/- as assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanation or supporting...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates