Notice u/s 148 in which no assessment year is mentioned cannot ...

Notice u/s 148 Invalid Without Specified Assessment Year; Advocate Lacked Authority to Accept Notice for Dissolved Firm.

July 27, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Notice u/s 148 in which no assessment year is mentioned cannot be treated as legal and valid notice. Further there is no material on record to show that the advocate of the dissolved firm had any authority to receive notice on behalf of the partners of the dissolved firm. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Notice u/s 148 in which no assessment year is mentioned cannot ...

Notice u/s 148 Invalid Without Specified Assessment Year; Advocate Lacked Authority to Accept Notice for Dissolved Firm.

July 27, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT held that the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid and quashed it. For the relevant assessment year 2017-18, the time limit of three years lapsed on...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided with the assessee on the key issue of the legality of the re-assessment notice under section 148. It was...

The provisions relating to assessment and reassessment under the Act are proposed to be rationalized. Key amendments include: substituting sections 148 and 148A to...

Sanction of specified authority u/s 151(1) is a condition precedent for issuing notice u/s 148 if the period of four years has elapsed from the end of the relevant...

Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Provisions and requirements for reopening an assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as amended. It emphasizes that mere 'change of opinion' without any new...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

Quick Updates: