Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2019 Year 2019 This

TP adjustment - Corporate/Management services fee - TPO cannot ...


TPO Cannot Reject Corporate Fees Based on Benefit; Must Focus on Arm's Length Price Assessment for Transactions.

April 27, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

TP adjustment - Corporate/Management services fee - TPO cannot reject the allowability of expenses simply on the ground that no benefit was derived - It is for the assessee to decide the way in which it has to carry on its business - Once it is proved that the services were availed, then TPO jurisdiction gets restricted to determining the ALP of the transaction.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal concerning the transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee fees for international transactions. The...

  3. TPA - the jurisdiction and power of TPO is to determine arm's length price of Royalty and the order of TPO holding that the assessee had not derived any benefit under...

  4. The ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) should consider comparables dealing in electronic products only, supported by a technical expert's certificate,...

  5. ITAT addressed multiple transfer pricing issues in an international business case. TPO was directed to reassess arm's-length pricing for trading segment transactions,...

  6. TP Adjustment - Arm's length price of the corporate guarantee fee - Lower authorities have also included a letter of comfort as part of corporate guarantee - We reject...

  7. Income Tax: TPO empowered to determine arm's length price for specified domestic transactions not referred by Assessing Officer or reported in audit report. Sections...

  8. If the Transfer Pricing Officer did not agree to the arm's length price shown by the assessee it was open for him to determine the arm's length price by applying one of...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Tribunal was correct to hold that when reference was made to the TPO by AO for determination of arm’s length price in relation to the...

  10. Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP segment/CH settlement) rejected due to negligible difference of 0.01% after considering cost adjustment...

  11. The High Court held that a change in the approach of assessing tax, without any statutory change, leads to uncertainty in cash flow and fund flow, which are crucial for...

  12. TP Adjustment - Determination of arm’s-length price - Law does not permit the TPO or DRP to determine the arm’s length price on estimation or adhoc basis. - Accordingly...

  13. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer...

  14. TP Adjustment - valuation of Arms Length Price (ALP) - No Arm's Length Price is required to be determined for a transaction with specified persons in section 40A(2)(b)...

  15. TP Adjustment - intra group services - The assessee has failed to completely demonstrate the Arm’s Length Price of intra group services by satisfying need test, benefit...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates