Addition u/s 68 - assessee had discharged its onus to prove the ...

Assessee Proves Share Applicant Credibility u/s 68; AO Fails to Disprove Without Evidence or Investigation.

May 7, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 68 - assessee had discharged its onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants, thereafter the onus shifted to AO to disprove the documents - In the absence of any investigation, much less gathering of evidence by the AO - addition cannot be sustained merely based on inferences drawn by circumstance

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - assessee had discharged its onus to prove the ...

Assessee Proves Share Applicant Credibility u/s 68; AO Fails to Disprove Without Evidence or Investigation.

May 7, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained share capital - both the nature & source of the share application and premium received by it was fully explained by the assessee. -...

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were added due to assessee's failure to discharge onus regarding bogus share capital including premium receipts. Despite filing...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - The Tribunal noted that the assessee provided complete details of the share subscribers, their financial...

Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

Unexplained cash credit addition u/s 68 - share application money - the assessee had discharged its onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the...

The assessee received share application money and premium from a company that admitted to providing accommodation entries. The AO rejected the assessee's claim, citing...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium received. The assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the subscriber companies and the...

Addition u/s 68 - assessee submitted all the necessary details in support of the share applicant and share premium receipt - The A.O. has not pointed out any defect in...

Addition u/s 68 - increase in share capital and share premium - As source of source is proved by the assessee in the instant case though the same is not required to be...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

Addition u/s 68 - If assessee had discharged its onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants by placing PAN details, bank...

Undisclosed cash credit u/s 68 - non-appearance of directors - As per DR assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of the share...

Quick Updates: