Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in ...


Penalty Quashed Due to Discrepancy Between Charge Explained and Actual Levy u/s 27(1)(c) for Income Concealment.

June 1, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in bank account - penalty has been initiated on the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars, but Ld.AO levied penalty on concealment of income - assessee was asked to explain penalty on one count whereas levy has been on other count - itself sufficient for quashing of penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  4. Levy of penalty - discrepancy in turnover - requirement of adding gross profit and freight charges to the purchase value - The Madras High Court concluded that the levy...

  5. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  6. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  7. Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

  8. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

  9. Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ITAT, Thus, there is no dispute with regard to the concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate...

  10. The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

  13. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  14. Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

  15. Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates