Jurisdiction/power of Tribunal to hear the appeal - Section 129 ...

Tribunal Can't Hear Appeals on Gold Bars as Baggage u/s 129; Baggage Rules, 2016 Apply.

June 14, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Jurisdiction/power of Tribunal to hear the appeal - Section 129 of Customs Act - Gold bars imported as Baggage - Baggage Rules, 2016 are applicable - Order of Commissioner (Appeals) which relates to the goods imported as baggage is not maintainable before this Tribunal

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction/power of Tribunal to hear the appeal - Section 129 ...

Tribunal Can't Hear Appeals on Gold Bars as Baggage u/s 129; Baggage Rules, 2016 Apply.

June 14, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Smuggling - Gold Bars - Baggage Rules - personal effects - As per Section 129 (A) Customs Act, 1962, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of...

Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - Baggage Rules, 2016 - Section 129A(1)(a) makes it clear that no appeal shall lie to the Tribunal in...

Import of Gold - bonafide baggage or not - the petitioner has violated the provisions of the Customs and Baggage Rules, 2016. The petitioner was duty bound to declare...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, ordering release of seized gold jewelry within 7 days. The court determined that Baggage Rules 2016 provision regarding items "carried...

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

Smuggling of the gold bars - bona fide baggage - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly avoided declaring the gold bars upon arrival, thus violating customs...

Interpretation of statute - whether "Certified Copy" prescribed for preferring an appeal could substitute "Certified Free Copy" provided u/r 50? Held: Issue dealt with...

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to India do not constitute "baggage" under the Customs Act 1962 and Baggage Rules 2016. The court determined...

HC directed CBIC to reconsider Baggage Rules 2016, particularly provisions regarding declaration of jewellery by incoming international passengers. HC observed that...

Seeks to amend Baggage Rules, 2016 - Notification

CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

Maintainability of appeal - monetary limit involved in the appeal - Smuggling - Gold Bars - The case involved the confiscation of 3.5 kg of gold bars by the Custom...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

Quick Updates: