Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - ...

No Appeals Allowed to Tribunal on Orders About Goods Imported or Exported as Baggage u/s 129A.

November 10, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - Baggage Rules, 2016 - Section 129A(1)(a) makes it clear that no appeal shall lie to the Tribunal in respect of any order which relates to any goods imported or exported as baggage. The gold which is imported here having been excluded by the definition of “personal effects” under Baggage Rules ibid, automatically falls within the ambit of baggage. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appeal shall lie before the Tribunal under Section 129A or not - ...

No Appeals Allowed to Tribunal on Orders About Goods Imported or Exported as Baggage u/s 129A.

November 10, 2021

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of the Tribunal - Indian currency/Goods - Baggage Rules - The Tribunal analyzed the definitions of baggage and goods under the Customs Act and observed that...

Smuggling - Gold Bars - Baggage Rules - personal effects - As per Section 129 (A) Customs Act, 1962, this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of...

Jurisdiction/power of Tribunal to hear the appeal - Section 129 of Customs Act - Gold bars imported as Baggage - Baggage Rules, 2016 are applicable - Order of...

The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for clearance of imported multi-color granite blocks due to not acquiring items free of cost. Commissioner...

CESTAT ruled that pan masala and gutkha exports could not be classified as "prohibited goods" merely for non-declaration of technical characteristics of inputs on...

The case involves a dispute over whether imported goods qualify as 'Capital Goods' for exemption under a customs notification. The Revenue alleged that the imports did...

The case pertains to the valuation and classification of imported goods as old and used second-hand goods or unused new goods. The key points are: The Chartered...

CESTAT Bangalore held that goods of foreign origin imported for repairs and return are eligible for exemption under the Notification No.153/1994. The appellant imported...

Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 governs the re-import of goods after export. Sr. No. 14 allows re-import for repair/reconditioning within 3/7 years,...

Violation of importing restricted goods - Import of Litebee wing-Nano Drone Components kits - Re-export of goods - The Tribunal examined the regulations governing the...

The case pertains to the import of Areca Nuts found to be substandard and unfit for human consumption due to visible fungal growth and musty odor, violating food safety...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

This public notice amends Appendix 2Y of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023 to exempt goods imported under Advance Authorisation, EOU, and SEZ schemes from mandatory Quality...

Valuation of imported goods - When goods are imported as baggage by a passenger, they are classified under Customs Tariff heading 98.03 regardless of what the individual...

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, explicitly excludes the Tribunal's jurisdiction over...

Quick Updates: