CIT(A) erred by assuming reassessment proceedings initiated by ...

Tax Tribunal Voids Assessment Orders Under Defunct Section 148; Error Found in Reassessment Validity Evaluation.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

CIT(A) erred by assuming reassessment proceedings initiated by AO u/s 148A were valid, ignoring merits of earlier assessment orders dated 31.03.2022 passed pursuant to notice issued on 30.06.2021 under old Section 148. ITAT held assessment orders based on notice issued under non-existent Section 148 were invalid, quashing them. CIT(A) ought to have independently determined validity of impugned orders instead of treating them as non-est due to subsequent Section 148A proceedings. Decided in assessee's favor.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIT(A) erred by assuming reassessment proceedings initiated by ...

Tax Tribunal Voids Assessment Orders Under Defunct Section 148; Error Found in Reassessment Validity Evaluation.

January 8, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - tangible materials - petitioner had failed to deduct withholding tax on the assumption that the AAR would issue a favourable ruling...

Issue of reassessment u/s 263, where the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) upheld the reassessment as erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest for verification...

Validity of assessment - Jurisdiction - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter to the assessment. In the case on hand it...

ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding the validity of notice u/s 143(2). The tribunal found that the notice was issued to an incorrect/non-existing...

Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 or assessment u/s 153C - reassessment was made based on the materials found in the course of search conducted on third party - The...

Validity of the draft assessment order issued in the name of non-existent entity - TP adjustment - arm’s-length price u/s 92CA - once the draft assessment order and...

Validity of assessment u/s 144C - Whether the passing of the draft assessment order as prescribed under section 144C(1) of the Act is mandatory or not? -...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the extended period of six years for reassessment could only be invoked under specific circumstances, one of...

Assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) OR 153C - The Tribunal held that the assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) for A.Y. 2012-13, based on the satisfaction recorded on...

HC quashed Tribunal's order regarding reopening of assessment based on alleged non-disclosure of unabsorbed investment allowance. The Tribunal erroneously concluded that...

Validity of assessment order us 153A - Approval by the JCIT as required u/s 153D - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter...

Validity of assessment u/s 144C - Non passing draft Assessment Order - TP Adjustment - AO merely captioned the final Assessment Order as Draft Assessment Order along...

TP Adjustment - Non follow procedure u/s.144C - Non referring to TPO - only draft assessment order passed - Draft assessment order cannot be treated as final assessment...

Quick Updates: