Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were ...

Refund of Special Additional Duty Allowed Despite Different VAT Payer and Importer Under Notification No. 102/2007.

June 22, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were different from the importer - certificate issued by the VAT clearly certifies that Mr. Ahmed Hajee Mohiudeen is the proprietor of M/s. Mohiudeen Saw Mills and M/s. Hajee Timber Complex and they have been registered dealer under the Karnataka VAT - the objection of the Department that these two concerns are separate entities is not justified - refund allowable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were ...

Refund of Special Additional Duty Allowed Despite Different VAT Payer and Importer Under Notification No. 102/2007.

June 22, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Unable to avail and utilized Cenvat Credit - Refund of the Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) - The order under challenge has wrongly rejected...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Seeks to prescribe rates of Special Additional Excise Duty for exports of petrol and diesel - Notification

Seeks to increase the effective rate of Special Additional Excise Duty on Petrol and Diesel.

Input tax credit (ITC) on Basic Customs Duty (BCD), Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) - In case of the Applicant, Basic Customs Duty (BCD),...

The appellant imported parts on which Special Additional Duty (SAD) was paid, but these parts were not sold as such. Instead, they were used for installation of an...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on goods sold with VAT charged is permissible u/s Notification No.102 of 2007 Cus. The tribunal found...

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee to claim refund of Rs. 3,28,75,733/- towards Central Value Added Tax credit,...

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - There is no stipulation in the notification that the exemption is available only if the rate of ST/VAT is equal to or higher than the...

Refund of SAD - what is manufactured and sold by the appellant is "Proflex Roof" and on such "Proflex Roof" VAT is paid. Therefore, it cannot be said the assessee has...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

Refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) - Period of limitation - Conditions of a notification should be strictly construed. This being so, as per sub para (c) of para 2...

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Quick Updates: