Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were ...

Case Laws Customs

June 22, 2019

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were different from the importer - certificate issued by the VAT clearly certifies that Mr. Ahmed Hajee Mohiudeen is the proprietor of M/s. Mohiudeen Saw Mills and M/s. Hajee Timber Complex and they have been registered dealer under the Karnataka VAT - the objection of the Department that these two concerns are separate entities is not justified - refund allowable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were ...

Case Laws Customs

June 22, 2019

You may also like:

The appellant imported parts on which Special Additional Duty (SAD) was paid, but these parts were not sold as such. Instead, they were used for installation of an...

Refund of SAD - mis-match of description of the goods - The SAD is paid on importation of the goods to safe guard the revenue of the state i.e. VAT/CST. As the same has...

Refund of SAD - no VAT was charged - NIL rate of VAT in terms of the notification issued under Rajasthan VAT Act 2003 is to be considered as appropriate sales tax/VAT -...

Denial of refund of SAD - Notification No. 102/2007 dated 14.09.2007 - the appropriate sales tax or VAT being NIL the appellants cannot be said to have violated the said...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on goods sold with VAT charged is permissible u/s Notification No.102 of 2007 Cus. The tribunal found...

A trader-importer, who paid SAD on the imported goods and who discharged VAT/ST liability on subsequent sale, and who issued commercial invoices without indicating any...

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007-Cus. - if the appropriate rate of sales tax/VAT was NIL then the appropriate sales tax/VAT paid will also be NIL - refund allowed - AT

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - There is no stipulation in the notification that the exemption is available only if the rate of ST/VAT is equal to or higher than the...

Refund of SAD - Notification no. 102/2007 dated 14.09.2007 - although they have not made an endorsement on the invoice that credit of duty is not admissible, refund allowed - AT

Refund of SAD - SAD had been paid, not in cash, but by utilising the DEPB scrip - scope of circular - Circular issued by the CBEC could not have imposed an additional...

Refund claim - SAD - N/N. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.9.2007 - appellant claims that even though initially they have availed the CENVAT credit of the duty paid on the said...

Refund of SAD - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The issue of time limit for filing refund claim was subject matter of litigation before the Hon’ble High...

Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007-Cus - all conditions including the time limit within which the refund claim has to be filed must be fulfilled. - The refund applications of...

Refund of SAD - Notification No. 102/2007 - Appellant failed to make any endorsement in the commercial invoices issued for the domestic sale that "no credit of SAD of...

Refund of CVD and Special Additional Duty (SAD) - claim were rejected on the ground that DEPB scrips cannot be re- credited - After granting exemption subject to certain...

Quick Updates: