Revision u/s 263 - Pr. CIT directed to make ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2019

Revision u/s 263 - Pr. CIT directed to make addition/disallowance in respect of expenditure incurred towards R&D u/s 35(2AB); Capital R&D expense allocated to Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries and re-characterization of remuneration earned from partnership firm (SPI) as royalty income - similar disallowances were already subject matter of appeals before Tribunal in earlier years in favour of assessee - revision order is not sustainable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Pr. CIT directed to make ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2019

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - Since the issue under consideration during the assessment proceedings was only confined to the disallowance of interest...

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

This case deals with the disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, which pertains to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income. The key points...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Wrong claim of business expenditure - Since the assessee failed to prove the nexus between the interest income and expenditure incurred, the...

Disallowances under section 30(1) - expenditure incurred on repair and renovation of renting premises allowed - HC

Revision u/s 263 - claiming business expenditure while claiming standard deduction in the rental income - No doubt assessee has claimed the voluntary expenditure under...

Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the...

Revision u/s 263 - disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - the assessee has not incurred any indirect expenses to earn the exempt income and ld. PCIT has not brought any...

Revision u/s 263 - Expenditure incurred on payments to sister concerns u/s 40A(2)(b) - Inaction on the part of the AO has caused prejudice to the Revenue as contemplated...

In the present case, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the expenditure claimed u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act on an ad-hoc basis. The AO did not challenge the...

Expenditure incurred on improvement/additions to leasehold property - The expenditure incurred by the assessee on construction of storage structure etc. has to be...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the issues on which the reassessment order was passed u/s 147 read with Section 143(3) and the issues on which the revision order was...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - in the light of the judicial precedents and in the light of fact that AO has conducted enquiries in respect of share capital...

Revision u/s 263 - The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) has a full authority to direct/propose certain additions or to delete certain additions. Therefore, it is a...

Quick Updates: