Condonation of delay of more than 2½ years - not aware of order ...

Tribunal Condones 2.5-Year Appeal Delay, Imposes Costs on Appellant for Lack of Proper Explanation.

July 10, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Condonation of delay of more than 2½ years - not aware of order - concur with the findings arrived by the Tribunal that the appellant had failed to offer proper explanation but at the same time, the Tribunal also could have considered about allowing the petitions on taking a liberal attitude, in terms of cost, in order to compensate the prejudices which may be caused to the opposite side - condoned the delay with cost

View Source

← Previous Next →

Condonation of delay of more than 2½ years - not aware of order ...

Tribunal Condones 2.5-Year Appeal Delay, Imposes Costs on Appellant for Lack of Proper Explanation.

July 10, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Income accrued in India - section 9(1)(i) - Explanation 5 has been given retrospective effect and Explanations 6 and 7 have been inserted in furtherance of the object of...

The High Court dealt with the maintainability of a petition concerning the non-constitution of an Appellate Tribunal and the jurisdiction and authority of the Assistant...

FEMA (Transfer or Issue Of Security By A Person Resident Outside India) - Sixth Amendment – Amendment In Regulations 2, 5, 10, 12 And Schedules 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7 - Notification

Income tax slabs - Upto 2 lacs = nil, from 2 lacs to 5 lacs = 10%, from 5 lacs to 10 lacs = 20%, above 10 lacs = 30%

Reduction of 5% of ALP u/s 92CA(2) – the order of the Tribunal in relation to the claim of reduction of 5% of arm's length price of international transaction in view of...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings where AO provided only 5 days to assessee for filing explanation under s.148A(b). Following judicial precedent that established 7...

Condonation of delay of 1434 days - Section 35B(3) of CEA - delay due to illness of concern persons and misplacement of paper due to loss of memory - sub-section (5)...

Punishment for contempt of orders of this Tribunal - the Respondents had no right under the compromise memo not to comply with the undertaking to discharge its dues to...

Additions u/s 2(22)(e) on account of deemed dividend - Accumulated profit - As per the provision of Explanation 2, all the profits of the company up to the date of...

Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable in relation to the period of limitation under tax laws like the Central Excise Act and the APGST Act. The Supreme...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of characterizing interconnect utility charges (IUC) as 'Royalty' for TDS u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act and India-Japan DTAA....

Power of Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal to condone delay - Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act does not apply to an appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act and...

Revision u/s 263 - Even though the ld. CIT was rightfully entitled to take recourse to the Explanation 2, but thereafter he needed to bring the case with in any one or...

Quick Updates: