Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 13, 2019

Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal placed reliance upon the decision of the a coordinate Bench of the Tribunal, then a speaking order would require the Tribunal to consider those decisions and state how and why the aforesaid decisions are not applicable to the facts of the present case - In the absence of this exercise is being done, order itself suffer from being a non speaking order - quashed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 13, 2019

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the receipt from supply planning services was not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the India-United...

GST levy on royalty payable for mining minerals - Reliance placed on Division Bench decision holding no GST recovery on royalty until Constitution Bench decision....

The coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently decided the issue of availment of CENVAT credit by insurance companies on invoices issued by dealers or...

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

The ITAT Hyderabad addressed the issue of determining the correct head of income for gains on the sale of property, whether it should be classified as business income or...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - the credit was reversed under GST Law at the time of filing refund claim. - It is very strange that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has...

Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to...

Initiation of anti-dumping investigation - the Designated Authority placed reliance upon certain material and facts for concluding the issue against the appellant -...

Detention order challenged due to non-supply of relevant WhatsApp chats, which were part of the evidence relied upon by the detaining authority. The High Court Division...

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

Waiver of Pre-Deposit – Reference made by one Bench of Tribunal to Larger Bench, on ground that two Benches of coordinate jurisdiction had come to different conclusions...

Quick Updates: