Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 24, 2022

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to take a different view. This mandate is subject only to the usual gateways of distinguishing the earlier decision or where the earlier decision is per incuriam. However, these are fetters only on a coordinate bench which, failing the possibility of availing of either of these gateways may yet differ with the view expressed and refer the matter to a bench of superior strength or in some cases to a bench of superior jurisdiction. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent ...

Case Laws Income Tax

September 24, 2022

You may also like:

Disciplinary proceedings against formerly Appellate Deputy Commissioner - If the order passed by the quasi judicial authority is taken as a foundation for bringing the...

Audit Objections – relevance in making re-assessments - The function of the audit is essentially executive in nature, while the function of the assessing officer and his...

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Misue of high positions of “Commissioner” - Provisional release of seized goods - It seems that the Additional Commissioner, while passing this order has not acted as...

Violation of judicial discipline - The Additional Director of DRI and the adjudicating authority effectively said that the Tribunal was not correct. If it be their...

Composition of Adjudicating Authority under PMLA and its Jurisdiction - Whether the quasi judicial bodies should consist of members having requisite qualification in the...

Cancellation of registration granted u/s 12AB - Assessment of trust - The ITAT held that the PCIT's order to cancel the registration from the financial year 2020-21 and...

Disallowance on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss - It is an undisputed fact that for the assessment year 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2016-17, the assessee declared...

The Authorities of the State are not expected to take advantage of a citizen / assessee’s ignorance. - It is not open to the Authority to ignore the evidence /...

The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

Assessment u/s 153A - In the case on hand, the search was conducted on 10.08.2017 and the relevant six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year...

Stay of demand - 1st respondent as the appellate authority exercises quasi-judicial powers. Power to consider prayer for stay is incidental and ancillary to the power to...

Allowing deduction not claimed by the assessee in its return of income u/s.54B - the Income Tax laws are welfare in nature and the very purpose of welfare legislation is...

Binding nature of Tribunal Order - Principle of “consistency” - Not only the Tribunal but all the Authorities subordinate to it are bound to follow and comply with the...

Quick Updates: