Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2019 Year 2019 This

Revenue Appeal against one order of Commissioner Appeal whereas ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

July 17, 2019

Revenue Appeal against one order of Commissioner Appeal whereas Commission has decided two cases simultaneously on similar issues - Though res judicata may not strictly apply to the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the aid of such principles can be taken. In the present case if this appeal is allowed, two inconsistent orders will come into existence. The present appeal, therefore, is liable to be dismissed for this reason.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present controversy, two different criminal appeals were being heard and decided against two different judgments based...

  2. Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) - Trade Discount - in the entire transaction only two persons are involved, one the appellant as exporter of the goods and second the...

  3. Disallowance of commission paid - excessive expense on commission - the average rate of commission paid by the assessee to others in respect of rice was 20, but rate of...

  4. Valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - The mandate to record reasons at the second stage of enquiry is not expressly stipulated, albeit it has been...

  5. Addition u/s 68 - Estimation of commission on accommodation entries - Though, it can be accepted that in case of accommodation entry provider only commission can be...

  6. Maintainability of Application for Settlement application - co-applicant - Since he is not the main applicant in the present case, he will not be debarred from...

  7. Commission income – Bofors Case – Important observations and decision of the ITAT summarized

  8. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

  9. Seized cash cannot be automatically released after 120 days u/s 132B's second proviso. This proviso applies only after the Assessing Officer determines the existing...

  10. Power of AO to pass an assessment order where application was filed before settlement commission – Income Tax Settlement Commission, rejected the application - decided...

  11. Challenge against the order passed by the Settlement Commission - reason behind the creation of Settlement Commission is to give a quietus to the dispute between the two...

  12. Settlement commission power u/s 245D - Commission could have either rejected the application or allowed it to be proceeded further - When a duty is casts on the...

  13. Confiscation of goods - proceeding simultaneously u/s 129 & 130 - except arguing that the authorities cannot invoke both the sections simultaneously, the petitioners...

  14. Reverse charge mechanism on commission paid to foreign commission agents does not attract service tax liability. Documentary evidence shows no direct payment made to...

  15. The High Court held that the Settlement Commission cannot reopen its concluded proceedings by invoking Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. Section 154 allows...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates