Invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction - petitioner not ...

Extraordinary writ jurisdiction can't exclude time for appeal filing. Reagitating decided issues is abuse of process & relitigation.

July 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction - petitioner not entitled to exclusion of time taken in writ proceedings from limitation period for filing appeal. Abuse of process of Court - reagitating issue already decided amounts to abuse, relitigation contrary to justice and public policy. Writ petition dismissed as petitioner cannot seek condonation of delay in filing appeal after writ proceedings set aside assessment order, filing appeal to avoid compliance with writ Court's directions is abuse of process.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction - petitioner not ...

Extraordinary writ jurisdiction can't exclude time for appeal filing. Reagitating decided issues is abuse of process & relitigation.

July 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Change of jurisdiction u/s 127 - As in the present case, the Assessing Officer rejected the objection regarding the jurisdiction and referred the matter to the PCIT to...

Power of the High Court in exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 - assessment of conflicting technical reports - It is well settled that the High...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

Jurisdiction of Additional CIT - The Standing Counsel should understand that this Tribunal is not to decide the mercy petition but has to decide the issue before it in...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

Oppression and mismanagement - Jurisdiction of NCLT to decide the issue - Principle of natural justice - the remedy provided under the Companies Act, 241 and 242 is a...

Levy interest u/s 234E - interest levied prior to amendment w.e.f. 1.6.2015 - diversified views - CIT(A) himself says, that the issue is debatable then the same takes...

Validity of assessment - no notice u/s 143(2) - the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (DCIT) was bad in law for want of issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As both the issues in question on the basis of which the Pr.CIT had assumed jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act had been considered and decided in...

Jurisdiction - Advance Authorization - It is an admitted fact that the Advance Autorization Licence of the petitioners is still valid and no action is taken by the DGFT...

Quick Updates: