Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the show cause notice ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 24, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c) AO had neither strike out the inappropriate words nor specify the charges against the assessee as to whether it is for “concealing particulars of income” or “furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - imposition of penalty cannot be sustained

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - the show cause notice ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 24, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defect in the SCN - AO has issued a generic show cause notice in a printed form without mentioning the specific charge by striking off the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - show cause notice issued u/s 274 of the Act does not specify the charge against the assessee as to whether it is for...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Validity of summary SCN - The notices under section 73(1) of the Act of 2017 at Annexure-1 of the respective writ petition is in the standard format and neither any...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Since it has been found that the show cause notice dated 12.02.2008 that was issued to the Assessee was vague and the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

Penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271(1)(c) is void ab initio and liable to be quashed as the AO has issued vague notice u/s 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) without striking off of...

Quick Updates: