Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2019 Year 2019 This

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order ...


Assessing Authority's Rectification Invalid Without Issued Assessment Order u/s 31; Entire Process Nullified.

August 1, 2019

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order issued by him there existed no basis to invoke the power of rectification u/s 31, by the assessing authority. Consequently, the assessing authority never acquired any jurisdiction to issue any notice or pass any order of rectification - The entire exercise carried by the assessing authority was a nullity and it must therefore necessarily fall.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction of rectification notice issued u/s 154 by the Income Tax Officer - authority competent to issue notices - Central Government has not made any scheme u/s...

  2. The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

  3. The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

  4. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  5. The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

  6. Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

  7. Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Fresh sanction under Section 151 - For a moment, even if accept Revenue’s contention that the present proceedings are continuation of...

  9. Jurisdiction - Additional Director General of DRI was a proper officer or not - The Additional Director General of DRI not having, in the first instance, assessed and...

  10. Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

  11. Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the...

  12. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  13. The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

  14. Rectification u/s 154 - non deduction of TDS u/s 194I - The Tribunal examined the rectification proceedings and found that the Assessing Officer's actions were not...

  15. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates