Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order ...

Assessing Authority's Rectification Invalid Without Issued Assessment Order u/s 31; Entire Process Nullified.

August 1, 2019

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order issued by him there existed no basis to invoke the power of rectification u/s 31, by the assessing authority. Consequently, the assessing authority never acquired any jurisdiction to issue any notice or pass any order of rectification - The entire exercise carried by the assessing authority was a nullity and it must therefore necessarily fall.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification of mistake - in absence of any assessment order ...

Assessing Authority's Rectification Invalid Without Issued Assessment Order u/s 31; Entire Process Nullified.

August 1, 2019

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Jurisdiction of rectification notice issued u/s 154 by the Income Tax Officer - authority competent to issue notices - Central Government has not made any scheme u/s...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Fresh sanction under Section 151 - For a moment, even if accept Revenue’s contention that the present proceedings are continuation of...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

Jurisdiction - Additional Director General of DRI was a proper officer or not - The Additional Director General of DRI not having, in the first instance, assessed and...

Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the...

Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Quick Updates: