Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 15, 2024

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held that, if the assessing authority who issued the notice himself did not mention that the objection to the draft assessment order was to be filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel as well as the assessing authority, presuming that the petitioner must have known that the objection was required to be filed before the assessing authority is a very high expectation by the assessing authority from the assessee. - The matter remanded back to the assessing authority to consider the direction issued by the DRP and pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with the law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 15, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of order - Faceless Assessment - draft assessment order u/s 144B - It hardly stood to reason that the department refused the request of the assessee for grant...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Notice issued u/s 148(A)(b) - Period of limitation - It is pertinent to mention here that since the defect committed by the Revenue by...

The High Court addressed the issue of Transitional Input Tax Credit time limitation, ruling that availing credit beyond thirty days is inadmissible, leading to tax...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - The Department has not raised any objection at the time of availing and utilizing the credit - when no objection was raised at the...

This notification amends the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017. The key amendment is in regulation 13(2), where...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons were supplied to the assessee only on 21.11.2017 and assessee on the same day filed the objections to the reopening of the...

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before the commissioner (appeals) - the appellate authority has no power to allow the appeal to be presented beyond the period of...

Condonation of delay of 163 days, 207 days & 197 days in filing appeal by Revenue - A perusal of paragraphs 3 to 8 of the application of condonation of delay would...

Provisional release of bank accounts - Section 83 of the CGST Act - time limitation for filing objections - The respondents do not suffer any adverse consequence on...

Condonation of delay u/s 100 of CGST Act - appeal against ruling of AAR - As per Section 100, the crucial words are "not exceeding thirty days" used in the proviso to...

Quick Updates: