Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2019 Year 2019 This

Repeated proceedings - once the matter has been finalised on ...


Adjudicating Authority Can't Reopen Finalized Cases u/s 11A Without Legal Permission; Multiple Proceedings Are Unlawful.

September 6, 2019

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Repeated proceedings - once the matter has been finalised on merits, the adjudicating authority had no jurisdiction to initiate proceedings in the same matter without a provision to that effect in the Act. - The subjecting of an assessee to repeated proceedings under section 11A is not the intent of law - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Maintainability of appeal in High Court - alternate remedy - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - the opportunity of an aggrieved person to adjudicate the legal grounds...

  2. Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

  3. Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

  4. Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor sought to reopen the application - Appellant had paid the due amount in full and final settlement with the Respondent/Operational...

  6. Composition of Adjudicating Authority under PMLA and its Jurisdiction - Whether the quasi judicial bodies should consist of members having requisite qualification in the...

  7. The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification and denying exemption, there should be a clear demand issued u/s 11A. Whereas, in the present case,...

  8. Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority - In The Case of M/s Nitco Ltd., Worli, Mumbai - Notification

  9. Suspension of license of public bonded warehouse - bonded goods were stored in non-bonded tanks - appellants pleaded that the disputed goods cannot be confiscated, when...

  10. This summary concerns the maintainability of a fresh application u/s 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant had filed an application u/s 94 in 2020,...

  11. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

  12. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

  13. 100% EOU - diversion of imported/indigenous goods procured duty free - The learned adjudicating authority has not examined the fact whether the respondent have achieved...

  14. While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event...

  15. Imposition of Cost on adjudicating authority - The adjudicating authority had passed the order without application of mind and such orders adversely and severely impinge...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates