The Commissioner had limited scope in the remand proceedings and ...

Commissioner Limited in Remand; Cannot Worsen Appellants' Position Due to No Revenue Appeal of Prior Order.

October 14, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

The Commissioner had limited scope in the remand proceedings and could not have put the appellants in more precarious position then what was held against them in the earlier proceedings specifically when revenue had not filed any appeal against the earlier order.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Commissioner had limited scope in the remand proceedings and ...

Commissioner Limited in Remand; Cannot Worsen Appellants' Position Due to No Revenue Appeal of Prior Order.

October 14, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Instructions regarding Income limits for assigning cases to Deputy Commissioners/Assistant Commissioners/ITOs - Order-Instruction

Scope of the order pursuant to remand back of the matter - Refund of Excess Duty paid - The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has travelled beyond the remand order passed by...

Scope of remand order - Refund of service tax - It is clear that the Assistant Commissioner travelled beyond the remand order as he proceeded to examine whether the...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Limited jurisdiction of trial court after remand order; cannot enlarge scope beyond remand directions. Trial court erred in allowing evidence beyond remand's limited...

Comparable selection for determining arm's length price (ALP) adjustment. Appeals limited to including or excluding certain uncontrolled entities as comparables...

Limitation for passing a assessment order - Consequential order passed by the assessing authority beyond the time limit specified u/s 153 (2A) - The High Court examined...

CESTAT upheld Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to remand case back to Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The original order was challenged for violating...

The appellant's appeal against the rejection of chargeability of Clean Energy Cess on imported metallurgical coke was dismissed. The Bills of Entry were filed in January...

The case involved an appeal dismissed due to the absence of a Board Resolution copy from the authorized signatory filing the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal held that as...

Appellant is subsidiaries or affiliate of the Unitech Limited or not - Unitech Holdings Limited a wholly owned subsidiary of Unitech Limited has shareholding to the...

The appeal challenged the legality of remanding the matter to the original authority and the legal authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to do so during the relevant...

Validity of remand order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) - The tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case without meeting specific...

The assessing officer (AO) exceeded jurisdiction by reclassifying income as fees for technical services (FTS) instead of royalty, contrary to the limited remand order...

Quick Updates: