Refund - unjust enrichment - there is a lapse of two to seven ...

Refund Claim for Unjust Enrichment: Delay in Posting Vouchers vs. Duty Payments Not Affected by Unjust Enrichment.

December 6, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund - unjust enrichment - there is a lapse of two to seven months in posting the general voucher vis-a-vis the payments made as duty is only an assumption and the balance sheet as on 31.3.2016 very clearly shows these amounts as receivables under current assets from the department and that this was an ample proof that the application for refund is not hit by unjust enrichment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - unjust enrichment - there is a lapse of two to seven ...

Refund Claim for Unjust Enrichment: Delay in Posting Vouchers vs. Duty Payments Not Affected by Unjust Enrichment.

December 6, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Claim of interest - Delayed refund - Unjust enrichment - appellant is entitled for claim of interest on delayed refund - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a...

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Quick Updates: