Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2019 Year 2019 This

Rectification u/s 154 - AO rectified the original assessment ...


AO's Rectification of Assessment Order u/s 154 Deemed Void for Ignoring DRP Directions u/s 144C(10).

December 12, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Rectification u/s 154 - AO rectified the original assessment order deleting the entire Transfer Pricing adjustment - as per the binding section i.e. Section 144C(10) of the Act, the mandatory provision was not followed by the Assessing Officer, thereby it is binding on the Assessing Officer to follow the directions of the DRP. Therefore, the assessment becomes null and void.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. TP adjustment - AO/TPO has not followed direction of DRP - As per section 144C(13) the AO is bound to pass the final assessment order in conformity with the direction of...

  2. ITAT ruled in favor of assessee on two key issues. First, the allegation of "on-money" payment for residential property was rejected as the difference between actual...

  3. Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

  4. Assessment u/s 144C - Royalty receipt - income from distribution of software licenses and providing support services - AO has not followed the directions of the DRP and...

  5. Validity of the final assessment order due to non-implementation of the directions of learned DRP - Royalty/FTS receipts - The ITAT underscored the legal requirement u/s...

  6. DRP directions without a valid computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) allotted and quoted in the body of the order are invalid and deemed never issued....

  7. Validity of assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with section 144B - the assessment order has been passed beyond the time limit prescribed u/s....

  8. The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the...

  9. HC ruled that time limits under Section 144C(13) for completing assessments following DRP directions are mandatory, not directory. The AO must pass orders within one...

  10. Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - In the case in hand, the direction for verification as issued were colourable and the Latin maxim “Quando...

  11. Assessment u/s 144C - It is not in dispute that if no directions are issued, AO need not wait u/s 144C (13). However, the fact remains that once objections are filed...

  12. Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) after direction of DRP u/s. 144C - time barred assessment - The final assessment order has been passed after the end of one month from the...

  13. TP Adjustment - applicability of Section 144C(13) - As provided in the Section 144C(13) of the Act, the final order of the Assessing Officer should be in conformity with...

  14. AO had no jurisdiction to frame the final assessment order on 27.01.2020 u/s. 144(3) of the Act, since he was divested of jurisdiction to pass final order between...

  15. The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks jurisdiction to direct the Transfer Pricing Officer or Assessing Officer in second-round proceedings after...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates