Clandestine removal - the adjudicating authority is opined to ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 30, 2019

Clandestine removal - the adjudicating authority is opined to have acted solely to confirm demands mechanically with predetermined negative mind because of his bias and prejudice and no willingness to appreciate the facts and records and apply the law correctly - Demand set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - the adjudicating authority is opined to ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 30, 2019

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Suppression of production and clandestine removal - bars/ rods - MS Ingots - The order is not discussing any documents of the appellant proving the alleged clandestine...

Clandestine manufacture and removal - shortage of finished goods or not - There was no clandestine removal of goods against the seized Gate Passes, which are also not...

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Clandestine manufacture and removal - plastic molded chairs - burden of proof to establish that there was clandestine manufacture - seizure of the pen drive -...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Clandestine removal of goods - assumption / presumption - demand based on the statement - charge of clandestine removal is not sustainable in the absence of any...

Clandestine removal - allegation to avail the benefit of area based exemption(Rookee unit) wrongly - demand is being confirmed against Ghaziabad unit, without producing...

Duty demand - Clandestine removal of goods - Lack of evidence - the demand cannot be confirmed for mere non-maintenance of records and more particularly, in absence of...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - illicit clearance of imported yarn and indigenous Yarn - detection of shortages at the time of the visit of the officers - The Appellant...

The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification and denying exemption, there should be a clear demand issued u/s 11A. Whereas, in the present case,...

Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

Clandestine removal - The confirmation of demand solely on the basis of fact that Appellant declared himself as manufacturer in tender documents cannot be sustained in law.

Quick Updates: