Allowable expenditure under Section 37(1) - protective ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 17, 2020

Allowable expenditure under Section 37(1) - protective assessment / additions - The question of making protective demand based on the assessment of the person who paid the amount the petitioner appears to be incorrect as assessment cannot be made subject to outcome of collateral proceedings of another person.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Allowable expenditure under Section 37(1) - protective ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 17, 2020

You may also like:

Protective assessment/addition - No substantive assessment/addition in the hands of other assessee - It is therefore a case where no substantive additions have been made...

Protective assessment - no addition can be made in the hands of the assessee - the protective addition made in the hands of the assessee for these three assessment...

Validity of Addition on protective basis - Although, there is no provision in the Income Tax Act authorizing the levy of income tax on a person other than whom income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

The assessing officer made protective additions u/ss 69, 69C, and 68 for amounts already considered by the firm where the assessee was a partner. However, the settlement...

Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - addition relating to form fees which was deposited for obtaining the wine shop through government - non-accepting the theory of...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

The concept of protective assessment also becomes important in a situation where the addition on substantive basis is deleted and in such an event, protective assessment...

Protective assessment - Addition in the hands of the Assessee Firm on protective basis - since the substantive addition has not been survived on account of being time...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A - Non issuance of notice U/s 143(2) - Protective assessment - the assessment has been made on a protective basis, but, it is not clear...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition of bogus purchases on protective basis in the hands of the assessee - Unless, it is brought over knowledge the fate of substantive...

Assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) OR 153C - The Tribunal held that the assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) for A.Y. 2012-13, based on the satisfaction recorded on...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Quick Updates: