Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not ...

Flat Purchase Case: No Violation of Section 171 CGST Act 2017 as No ITC Benefits Were Received or Passed On.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit available to the Respondent which was to be passed on to his buyers - it is established that the Respondent was not liable to pass on the benefit of ITC to the Applicant No. 1 and thus he has not contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not ...

Flat Purchase Case: No Violation of Section 171 CGST Act 2017 as No ITC Benefits Were Received or Passed On.

March 9, 2020

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project Heritage Max - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC - This benefit was...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him....

Profiteering - purchase of flat - the Respondent has not reduced the basic price of his flats by 0.14% in case of the above Project due to additional benefit of ITC...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of benefit of Input Tax Credit has not be passed on - The Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed - Since the present investigation is only up to 30.06.2018 any benefit of ITC which...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Quick Updates: