Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not ...

Case Laws GST

March 9, 2020

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit available to the Respondent which was to be passed on to his buyers - it is established that the Respondent was not liable to pass on the benefit of ITC to the Applicant No. 1 and thus he has not contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not ...

Case Laws GST

March 9, 2020

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - whether there was any additional benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST availed by the Respondent or not. - This case does not...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - It is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he is not...

Profiteering - sale of flats - the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 0.14%...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the prices - the ITC,...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - supply of construction services related to purchase of Flat - the ratio of ITC in pre-GST period was higher than the post-GST period. - The allegation...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Quick Updates: