Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of ...

Respondent Accused of Not Passing ITC Benefits to Flat Buyers, Violating Section 171 of CGST Act 2017.

August 6, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of benefit of Input Tax Credit has not be passed on - The Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent or 4.25% of the turnover during the period from July 2017 to December 2019 and hence the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as he has not passed on the benefit of such additional ITC to his customers. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of ...

Respondent Accused of Not Passing ITC Benefits to Flat Buyers, Violating Section 171 of CGST Act 2017.

August 6, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him....

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit...

Profiteering - benefit of ITC and reduction in price of Flat - the Respondent though aware of the fact that the net benefit of ITC had to be passed on to his buyers had...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

Profiteering - sale of a built up house - DGAP's Report revealed that the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover post GST period increase from 0.61% to 3.45% i.e net...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed - Since the present investigation is only up to 30.06.2018 any benefit of ITC which...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project Heritage Max - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC - This benefit was...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Quick Updates: