Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Addition u/s 68 - LTCG - penny stock companies - A.O. merely ...


Assessing Officer's Addition u/s 68 Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence After SEBI Interim Order Revoked.

March 14, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - LTCG - penny stock companies - A.O. merely relied upon interim order of the SEBI to make addition against the assessee, otherwise, there were no evidence or material on record to disprove the claim of assessee. Since the interim order of the SEBI have been revoked against the assessee and M/s EBFL, therefore, nothing survives in favour of the A.O. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  2. ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed...

  3. Validity of additions made u/s 153A, 69C, 68, and 69A of the Income Tax Act. It discusses the lack of incriminating material or documents found during the search to...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in making additions u/s 68 for unsecured loans and disallowing interest component. The assessee demonstrated...

  5. The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - Simply because the directors/shareholders did not present themselves before the Assessing Officer, an addition u/s 68 cannot be made.

  7. Unexplained Investment u/s 68 instead of u/s 69 - there is total lack of application of mind, the Assessing Officer had not formed the opinion objectively with reference...

  8. Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Bogus LTCG - The Tribunal examined the transactions and found that the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on...

  9. Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely based on sworn statement recorded u/s 132(4) without corroborative materials. Onus lies on the Department to collect cogent...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - The CIT(A) has observed that the transactions was part of the turnover/sale, whereas the addition has been made under Section 68 of the Act without...

  11. Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the evidences without any discussion or reason. The CIT (A) has not mentioned as to what more evidence were...

  12. The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - If the assessee could not produce the Directors during the assessment proceedings in response to the summons issued by the Assessing Officer due to...

  14. The assessee was allowed to claim depreciation on assets held in the name of directors, based on the principle of beneficial ownership recognized by the Supreme Court....

  15. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained credit - scope of amended provisions of section 68 - onus to prove source of source - Although, the issue before us pertains to assessment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates