Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 3, 2020

Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the evidences without any discussion or reason. The CIT (A) has not mentioned as to what more evidence were needed to be produced by the assessee to substantiate its contention or what are the material or information to rebut the assessee’s explanation and evidences as discussed above. AO as well as the CIT(A) failed to appreciate or consider the more than sufficient evidences placed on record by the assessee to discharge the onus u/s 68 - Addition made u/s 68 of the Act is hereby deleted. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 3, 2020

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

Addition u/s 68 - it is contended before AO that advances (cash credit) were made against the purchase of goods - AO and the Appellate Authority have the power of Civil...

Addition u/s 68 r.w. section 115BBE - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The tribunal finds that the AO did not provide a satisfactory explanation for...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions with Shri Singla...

Appellate Authority affirmed impugned order without evidence regarding petitioner's intention to evade tax. Inconsistent approach rejecting petitioner's contention for...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Section 68 addition for cash deposits cannot be made where assessee filed return u/s 44AD and did not maintain books of accounts, as provisions of section 68 apply only...

Assessee issued shares at fair market value computed as per Rule 11UA(2), but Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected valuation without justification. Statute...

Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely based on sworn statement recorded u/s 132(4) without corroborative materials. Onus lies on the Department to collect cogent...

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority,...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG from sale of shares. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted on a...

Addition u/s 68 - receipt of gift - the primary onus to establish the identity and creditworthiness of the concerned donors as well as the genuineness of the relevant...

Addition u/s 68 - the additional ground raised by the assessee that addition cannot be made u/s 68 of the Act on the basis of the bank statement is rejected.

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

Additions u/s 68 - Low profit ratio - the assessee has discharged his onus before the revenue authorities. AO and the ld. CIT(A) rejected the explanation of the assessee...

Quick Updates: