Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Bogus LTCG - The Tribunal ...


Tribunal Overturns LTCG Addition Due to Lack of Evidence, Rules Assessing Officer's Decision Unsustainable.

April 29, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Bogus LTCG - The Tribunal examined the transactions and found that the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on surmises and conjectures. It emphasized that there was no evidence to support the characterization of the transactions as sham or bogus. Referring to precedent and the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  2. Addition u/s 69A - cash loans given by the assessee as unexplained - decoding of the entries in the seized materials - The tribunal found that the assessing officer's...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  5. The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

  6. Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

  7. The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

  8. Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

  9. The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

  10. The assessee was allowed to claim depreciation on assets held in the name of directors, based on the principle of beneficial ownership recognized by the Supreme Court....

  11. The assessee's reconciliation explained total purchases, including capital goods and purchase returns, tallying with recorded purchases. The Tribunal correctly held that...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  13. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  14. The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple issues in the case. Firstly, it ruled that disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) can only be made in relation to "related parties," not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates